Eva S. Peper

411 citations
22 papers · 275 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Eva S. Peper

21 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers

Eva S. Peper
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 126
  • Neurology 52
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 71
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 49
  • Biophysics 5
Replace Derek Emery with:
Derek Emery Canada
Nozomi Hamasaki Japan
Liesbeth Geerts Netherlands
Moss Zhao United States
Samantha E. Schoeneman United States
Sophie N. Davie Canada
Ty Shang United States
A. Abbruzzese Italy
Yoshimori Kassai Japan
Samuel W. Fielden United States
Eva S. Peper relative to Derek Emery Canada Derek Emery's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Derek Emery · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva S. Peper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva S. Peper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva S. Peper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva S. Peper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva S. Peper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva S. Peper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva S. Peper. The network helps show where Eva S. Peper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva S. Peper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva S. Peper Line = papers co-authored together Eva S. Peper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201537
2 202036
3 201933
4 202028
5 202226
6 202022
7 201817
8 201816
9 201911
10 20229
11 20199
12 20238
13 20216
14 20215
15 20213
16 20242
17 20242
18 20222
19 20231
20 20251

About Eva S. Peper

Eva S. Peper is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Neurology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (15 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (4 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (3 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (2 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (126 citations), Neurology (52 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (71 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (49 citations) and Biophysics (5 citations). Eva S. Peper has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Bram F. Coolen, Pim van Ooij, Aart J. Nederveen, Gustav J. Strijkers, Qinwei Zhang, Jessica Bastiaansen, Christoph Gräni, Henk A. Marquering, Bernd Jung and Karin Markenroth Bloch. Their work appears in journals such as Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, European Radiology Experimental, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact