Studies In Australasian Cinema

205 papers and 406 indexed citations i.

About

The 205 papers published in Studies In Australasian Cinema in the last decades have received a total of 406 indexed citations. Papers published in Studies In Australasian Cinema usually cover Economics and Econometrics (121 papers), Sociology and Political Science (81 papers) and Urban Studies (68 papers) specifically the topics of Cinema and Media Studies (120 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (68 papers) and Australian History and Society (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies In Australasian Cinema are Adrián Martín, Craig Batty, Ramón Lobato, Mike Walsh, Ben Goldsmith, Mark David Ryan, Marsha Berry, Audrey Yue, Deb Verhoeven and Catherine Simpson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studies In Australasian Cinema

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies In Australasian Cinema. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies In Australasian Cinema.

Countries where authors publish in Studies In Australasian Cinema

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies In Australasian Cinema. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies In Australasian Cinema with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies In Australasian Cinema more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025