Michelle Bates

7.2k citations
39 papers · 967 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Michelle Bates

37 papers receiving 950 citations

Peers

Michelle Bates
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Reproductive Medicine 198
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 514
  • Immunology 301
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 86
  • Parasitology 74
Replace Shizuka Mita with:
Shizuka Mita Japan
Jana Auer France
C. Bohring Germany
Mengcheng Luo China
Serafina Massari Italy
Clara I. Marín‐Briggiler Argentina
Andrea Cristina Vetö Arnholdt Brazil
Jing‐Pian Peng China
H Nagasawa Japan
Beatriz Fernández-Fuertes Spain
Michelle Bates relative to Shizuka Mita Japan Shizuka Mita's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Shizuka Mita · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Bates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Bates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Bates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Bates. The network helps show where Michelle Bates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michelle Bates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michelle Bates Line = papers co-authored together Michelle Bates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005176
2 201489
3 201287
4 200185
5 201877
6 201567
7 200966
8 199050
9 200048
10 201040
11 201925
12 201917
13 198716
14 202014
15 200113
16 202113
17 200110
18 20199
19 20218
20 20007

About Michelle Bates

Michelle Bates is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Reproductive Medicine, Immunology and Insect Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 967 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Research on Leishmaniasis Studies (17 papers), Trypanosoma species research and implications (9 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (6 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (4 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (3 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (2 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (2 papers) and Malaria Research and Control (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (198 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (514 citations), Immunology (301 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (86 citations) and Parasitology (74 citations). Michelle Bates has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Thailand and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Giles H. Vince, Paul A. Bates, Siobhan Quenby, Roy G. Farquharson, Narissara Jariyapan, Pradya Somboon, Francis A. Barr, Xenia Peñate, Padet Siriyasatien and Ricardo Bastos. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, Fertility and Sterility, PLoS neglected tropical diseases, Parasitology and Parasitology Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact