Michèle Studer

7.7k citations
83 papers · 5.8k · h-index 40

Impact in

Papers in

Michèle Studer

79 papers receiving 5.7k citations

Peers

Michèle Studer
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Developmental Neuroscience 1.1k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.5k
  • Molecular Biology 4.2k
  • Genetics 1.5k
  • Sensory Systems 250
Replace Jun Aruga with:
Jun Aruga Japan
Kathleen J. Millen United States
Filippo M. Rijli France
Fadel Tissir Belgium
Jean M. Hébert United States
Anastassia Stoykova Germany
Shubha Tole India
Federico Calegari Germany
Alessandra Pierani France
Larysa Pevny United States
Michèle Studer relative to Jun Aruga Japan Jun Aruga's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jun Aruga · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michèle Studer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michèle Studer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michèle Studer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michèle Studer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michèle Studer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michèle Studer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michèle Studer. The network helps show where Michèle Studer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michèle Studer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michèle Studer Line = papers co-authored together Michèle Studer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995427
2 1994390
3 1996357
4 1998289
5 2005277
6 1998276
7 1994255
8 1996224
9 2007190
10 2011179
11 1993149
12 2015139
13 2007119
14 2013118
15 2010101
16 2010100
17 200497
18 201391
19 200690
20 199990

About Michèle Studer

Michèle Studer is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Neurology and Genetics, having authored 83 papers that have together received 5.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (25 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (21 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (18 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (17 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (11 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (6 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (5 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (1.1k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.5k citations), Molecular Biology (4.2k citations), Genetics (1.5k citations) and Sensory Systems (250 citations). Michèle Studer has collaborated with scholars based in France, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robb K. Krumlauf, Heather M. Marshall, Heike Pöpperl, Andrew Lumsden, Linda Ariza‐McNaughton, Sydney Brenner, Samuel A. J. R. Aparicio, Atsushi Kuroiwa, Filippo M. Rijli and Pierre Chambon. Their work appears in journals such as Development, Developmental Biology, Cerebral Cortex, Brain Structure and Function and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact