Michele D’Adderio

22 papers receiving 154 citations

Peers

Michele D’Adderio
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 123
  • Algebra and Number Theory 63
  • Geometry and Topology 99
  • Mathematical Physics 66
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 47
Replace Chenjie Fan with:
Chenjie Fan United States
Luca Moci Italy
Patrick Brosnan United States
Enrique Artal Bartolo Spain
Helena Verrill United States
José Agustín Spain
Swapneel Mahajan United States
Eva María Feichtner Switzerland
Eugene Gorsky United States
C. Snyder United States
Michele D’Adderio relative to Chenjie Fan United States Chenjie Fan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Chenjie Fan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michele D’Adderio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michele D’Adderio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michele D’Adderio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michele D’Adderio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michele D’Adderio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michele D’Adderio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michele D’Adderio. The network helps show where Michele D’Adderio may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Michele D’Adderio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michele D’Adderio Line = papers co-authored together Michele D’Adderio links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201239
2 201220
3 201414
4 202213
5 202113
6 20129
7 20199
8 20198
9 20157
10 20206
11 20195
12 20214
13 20224
14 20123
15 20233
16 20213
17 20222
18 20222
19 20202
20 20081

About Michele D’Adderio

Michele D’Adderio is a scholar working on Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Algebra and Number Theory, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics and Statistics and Probability, having authored 25 papers that have together received 171 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (18 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (8 papers), Advanced Mathematical Identities (8 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (4 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (4 papers), Advanced Operator Algebra Research (3 papers), Random Matrices and Applications (3 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Geometry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (123 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (63 citations), Geometry and Topology (99 citations), Mathematical Physics (66 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (47 citations). Michele D’Adderio has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Luca Moci, Anton Mellit, Jean-Christophe Aval, Mark Dukes, Tullio Ceccherini‐Silberstein, Luca Migliorini and Joost Vercruysse. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Combinatorics, Springer monographs in mathematics, Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society and International Mathematics Research Notices.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact