Michael Wreen
Impact in
- Philosophy top 5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
-
- Visual Culture and Art Theory
Papers in
- Philosophy 20
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 10
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 8
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 5
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 4
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 6
- Co-authors
- Monroe Curtis Beardsley (2 shared papers)Hye‐Kyung Kim (5 shared papers)Gerald Mast (1 shared paper)Michael Tooley (1 shared paper)Soo Il Shin (2 shared papers)Yeon Hee Kim (2 shared papers)Anita Silvers (1 shared paper)Roland J. Teske (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Metaphilosophy (4 papers)Informal Logic (3 papers)Philosophy (3 papers)Philosophia (3 papers)Argumentation (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Michael Wreen
56 papers receiving 323 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Philosophy 86
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 35
- Music 14
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 55
- Cognitive Neuroscience 57
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Wreen
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Wreen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Wreen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Wreen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Wreen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Wreen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Wreen. The network helps show where Michael Wreen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Michael Wreen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1983 | 74 | |
| 2 | 1988 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 27 | |
| 4 | 1988 | 27 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 20 | |
| 6 | 1981 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 16 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 15 | |
| 10 | 1983 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1989 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1989 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 8 | |
| 15 | 1988 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 5 |
About Michael Wreen
Michael Wreen is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and General Health Professions, having authored 64 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (8 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (5 papers), Ethics in medical practice (5 papers), Free Will and Agency (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (86 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (35 citations), Music (14 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (55 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (57 citations). Michael Wreen has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Monroe Curtis Beardsley, Hye‐Kyung Kim, Gerald Mast, Michael Tooley, Soo Il Shin, Yeon Hee Kim, Anita Silvers, Roland J. Teske, RICHARD C. TAYLOR and Sung‐Su Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Metaphilosophy, Informal Logic, Philosophy, Philosophia and Argumentation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.