Michael Stach

29 papers receiving 280 citations

Peers

Michael Stach
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Applied Psychology 106
  • Sensory Systems 48
  • General Health Professions 96
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 45
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 66
Replace Damien Lekkas with:
Damien Lekkas United States
Jorge Pérez‐Martín Spain
Miloš Stanković Serbia
Ravi Karkar United States
Kiero Guerra-Peña Dominican Republic
Umit Tokac United States
Tara E. Karns United States
Chris Ferguson United States
Θεόδωρος Κωστούλας Greece
Aditya Ponnada United States
Michael Stach relative to Damien Lekkas United States Damien Lekkas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Damien Lekkas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Stach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Stach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Stach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Stach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Stach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Stach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Stach. The network helps show where Michael Stach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Stach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Stach Line = papers co-authored together Michael Stach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202044
2 202043
3 202136
4 201726
5 202025
6 202022
7 202214
8 202010
9 20227
10 20216
11 20206
12 20176
13 20055
14 20234
15 20104
16 20044
17 20063
18 20063
19 20242
20 20222

About Michael Stach

Michael Stach is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (13 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (11 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (5 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (4 papers), Optical Network Technologies (3 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers) and Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (106 citations), Sensory Systems (48 citations), General Health Professions (96 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (45 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (66 citations). Michael Stach has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Harald Baumeister, Manfred Reichert, Rüdiger Pryss, Eva-Maria Meßner, Lasse Sander, Yannik Terhorst, Thomas Probst, Winfried Schlee, Dana Schultchen and Robin Kraft. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Sleep Research, JMIR mhealth and uhealth, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact