Michael Soth

1.3k citations
25 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

    • Synthesis and biological activity 8
    • Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds 4
    • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers 2

Michael Soth

25 papers receiving 981 citations

Peers

Michael Soth
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Organic Chemistry 365
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 169
  • Molecular Biology 338
  • Cancer Research 66
  • Genetics 41
Replace Masaaki Sawa with:
Masaaki Sawa Japan
Yongqin Wan United States
Matthew W. D. Perry Sweden
Matthias Gehringer Germany
Eric T. Sun United States
John I. Trujillo United States
Danny Tam United States
Karl F. Erhard United States
Eric S. Marr United States
Céline Cano United Kingdom
Michael Soth relative to Masaaki Sawa Japan Masaaki Sawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Masaaki Sawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Soth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Soth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Soth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Soth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Soth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Soth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Soth. The network helps show where Michael Soth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Soth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Soth Line = papers co-authored together Michael Soth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999190
2 2009160
3 201498
4 202073
5 201168
6 201264
7 199745
8 202343
9 200241
10 199834
11 201331
12 201331
13 201125
14 201425
15 202123
16 202123
17 201419
18 200618
19 202317
20 202012

About Michael Soth

Michael Soth is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Oncology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthesis and biological activity (8 papers), Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (5 papers), Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (4 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers), Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases (2 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (2 papers) and Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (365 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (169 citations), Molecular Biology (338 citations), Cancer Research (66 citations) and Genetics (41 citations). Michael Soth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include James S. Nowick, Kimberly D. Stigers, A. Kuglstatter, DAVID M. GOLDSTEIN, Yan Chun Lou, Peter Wipf, Linghao Niu, Sue Jin, John G. Menke and Vaishali Pavalbhai Patel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and JCI Insight.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact