Michael Shaw
Impact in
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 10%
- Visual Culture and Art Theory
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Narrative Theory and Analysis
- Themes in Literature Analysis
Papers in
- History 2
- Scottish History and National Identity 2
-
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering 1
- Co-authors
- Hans Robert Jauß (1 shared paper)Marlies Kronegger (1 shared paper)Margaret Kasschau (1 shared paper)Abhishek Datta (1 shared paper)Leigh Charvet (1 shared paper)R. A. A. Morrall (1 shared paper)Marom Bikson (1 shared paper)Kathleen Sherman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Literature Compass (1 paper)Journal of Visualized Experiments (1 paper)Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology (1 paper)Feminist Studies (1 paper)Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michael Shaw
4 papers receiving 91 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 19
- Literature and Literary Theory 43
- Philosophy 34
- General Psychology 3
- General Arts and Humanities 2
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Shaw
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Shaw more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Shaw
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Shaw. The network helps show where Michael Shaw may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Michael Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1985 | 133 | |
| 2 | The Wolf-Man : conversations with Freud's patient--sixty years later | 1982 | 10 |
| 3 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 5 | The European Parliament and the Community budget | 1978 | 1 |
| 6 | 1976 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 0 |
About Michael Shaw
Michael Shaw is a scholar working on History, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Sociology and Political Science and Museology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 155 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers), Irish and British Studies (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (1 paper), Joseph Conrad and Literature (1 paper), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (1 paper) and European Monetary and Fiscal Policies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (19 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (43 citations), Philosophy (34 citations), General Psychology (3 citations) and General Arts and Humanities (2 citations). Michael Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hans Robert Jauß, Marlies Kronegger, Margaret Kasschau, Abhishek Datta, Leigh Charvet, R. A. A. Morrall, Marom Bikson, Kathleen Sherman and Shirley Harkess. Their work appears in journals such as Literature Compass, Journal of Visualized Experiments, Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, Feminist Studies and Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.