Anne Carson
Impact in
- Anthropology top 10%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Philosophy top 5%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Papers in
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies 6
-
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 2
- Philosophy and Literary Analysis 2
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 2
- Co-authors
- David Sider (1 shared paper)Barbara K. Gold (1 shared paper)Danielle Allen (1 shared paper)Εὐριπίδης (1 shared paper)Julian C. Leslie (1 shared paper)David Shaw (1 shared paper)Mark Halliday (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Common Knowledge (2 papers)The Classical World (2 papers)Phoenix (1 paper)Classical Philology (1 paper)Critical Inquiry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Anne Carson
24 papers receiving 126 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Anthropology 77
- Philosophy 59
- Literature and Literary Theory 51
- Archeology 46
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 16
Countries citing papers authored by Anne Carson
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Carson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Carson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Carson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Carson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Carson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Carson. The network helps show where Anne Carson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Anne Carson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1986 | 64 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 45 | |
| 3 | Wedding at Noon in Pindar’s Ninth Pythian | 2004 | 16 |
| 4 | 1992 | 13 | |
| 5 | Autobiography of Red | 1998 | 11 |
| 6 | 1988 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 5 | |
| 12 | The Beauty of the Husband: A Fictional Essay in 29 Tangos | 2001 | 5 |
| 13 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1984 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 17 | Writing on the World: Simonides, Exactitude, and Paul Celan | 1997 | 2 |
| 18 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 19 | Grief lessons : four plays | 2006 | 1 |
| 20 | Verre, ironie et Dieu | 2004 | 1 |
About Anne Carson
Anne Carson is a scholar working on Anthropology, Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, Archeology and Religious studies, having authored 33 papers that have together received 227 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (6 papers), Literature and Cultural Memory (4 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Philosophy and Literary Analysis (2 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers) and Translation Studies and Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (77 citations), Philosophy (59 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (51 citations), Archeology (46 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (16 citations). Anne Carson has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David Sider, Barbara K. Gold, Danielle Allen, Εὐριπίδης, Julian C. Leslie, David Shaw and Mark Halliday. Their work appears in journals such as Common Knowledge, The Classical World, Phoenix, Classical Philology and Critical Inquiry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.