Michael Schlapp

30 papers receiving 344 citations

Peers

Michael Schlapp
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Radiation 81
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 158
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 38
  • Materials Chemistry 127
  • Spectroscopy 44
Replace George C. Summerfield with:
George C. Summerfield United States
Yasuhiko Kojima Japan
Martin Hanuš Czechia
R. Trassl Germany
Leonid G. Gerchikov Russia
W. Krätschmer Germany
Tooru Ebisawa Japan
P. S. Mazumdar India
Lalit Kumar India
K. G. Tschersich Germany
Michael Schlapp relative to George C. Summerfield United States George C. Summerfield's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
George C. Summerfield · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Schlapp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Schlapp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Schlapp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Schlapp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Schlapp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Schlapp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Schlapp. The network helps show where Michael Schlapp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Schlapp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Schlapp Line = papers co-authored together Michael Schlapp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199391
2 199628
3 199327
4 199119
5 199816
6 200416
7 199215
8 199814
9 200613
10 199713
11 200212
12 200211
13 199510
14 199510
15 20049
16 20169
17 20027
18 20015
19 19975
20 20025

About Michael Schlapp

Michael Schlapp is a scholar working on Radiation, Aerospace Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 31 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (11 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (9 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (8 papers), Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research (5 papers), Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (5 papers), Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds (4 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (81 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (158 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (38 citations), Materials Chemistry (127 citations) and Spectroscopy (44 citations). Michael Schlapp has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Erhard Salzborn, R. Trassl, Gerd Hofmann, M. Stenke, Markus Steidl, Heinz von Seggern, M. Liehr, H B Gilbody, J Geddes and J. M. Woolsey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Physics D Applied Physics, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Applied Physics A, Review of Scientific Instruments and Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact