Michael S. Wade

4.7k citations
61 papers · 3.2k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Michael S. Wade

59 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Michael S. Wade
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Virology 252
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 823
  • Ophthalmology 198
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 380
  • Neurology 138
Replace C A Hébert with:
C A Hébert United States
Christoph Hess Switzerland
Raffaele De Palma Italy
Jeffrey Siegel United States
Cornelis L. Verweij Netherlands
Grover C. Bagby United States
Atsuhisa Ueda Japan
Hidechika Okada Japan
Catherine J. Baty United States
Suofu Qin United States
Michael S. Wade relative to C A Hébert United States C A Hébert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
C A Hébert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael S. Wade

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael S. Wade's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael S. Wade with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael S. Wade more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael S. Wade

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael S. Wade. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael S. Wade. The network helps show where Michael S. Wade may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael S. Wade, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael S. Wade Line = papers co-authored together Michael S. Wade links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998354
2 2007296
3 2006274
4
Transcription from TATA-less promoters: dihydrofolate reductase as a model.
1993228
5 1980178
6 2004152
7 2009151
8 2006139
9 1992108
10 200685
11 201281
12 200779
13 199577
14 201269
15 199265
16 200363
17 200957
18 200753
19 201252
20 201147

About Michael S. Wade

Michael S. Wade is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (12 papers), Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling (4 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (4 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (3 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (3 papers), Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (3 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (3 papers) and Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (252 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (823 citations), Ophthalmology (198 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (380 citations) and Neurology (138 citations). Michael S. Wade has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Jane Clifford Azizkhan, Andrew J. Pierce, Carl Arneson, Thomas L. Hunt, Joe G. N. Garcia, Roger Jeffs, Shwu‐Fan Ma, Timothy F. Kowalik, Maria Mudryj and Dennis D. Taub. Their work appears in journals such as CHEST Journal, PLoS ONE, The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Molecular and Cellular Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact