Michael Richards

22 papers receiving 316 citations

Peers

Michael Richards
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Neurology 63
  • Ophthalmology 35
  • Sensory Systems 15
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 57
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 48
Replace Michael Fendick with:
Michael Fendick United States
Paul A. Young United States
Brian P. Schmidt United States
Márta Janáky Hungary
Zhimo Yao China
J. A. Sharpe Canada
Michael E. Breton United States
M. Neveu United Kingdom
Andrew R. Wagner United States
Pedro Faria Portugal
Michael Richards relative to Michael Fendick United States Michael Fendick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Michael Fendick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Richards

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Richards's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Richards with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Richards more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Richards

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Richards. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Richards. The network helps show where Michael Richards may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Richards, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Richards Line = papers co-authored together Michael Richards links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198761
2 200757
3 201047
4 200828
5 200827
6 201527
7 202019
8 201714
9 19839
10 20188
11 20088
12 20187
13 20194
14 20074
15 20184
16 20062
17
Antonio Vallejo Nágera: Heritage, psychiatry and war
20121
18 20191
19 20211
20 20161

About Michael Richards

Michael Richards is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neurology, Molecular Biology and Ophthalmology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (63 citations), Ophthalmology (35 citations), Sensory Systems (15 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (57 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (48 citations). Michael Richards has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Agnes Wong, Lawrence Tychsen, Matthew E. Pamenter, Paul Foeller, Leslie T. Buck, Dolores Bradley, Herbert C. Goltz, Andreas Burkhalter, Joseph L. Demer and G. D. Thorburn. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Journal of Vision, BMJ Open Ophthalmology and Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact