Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if any of the following hold:
it has ≥500 total citations;
it reaches ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (the
threshold is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it);
it reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.
1997Elsevier eBooks
1969Medical Entomology and Zoology
1968Science
1966Philosophy
1962Minerva
1960American Sociological Review
Peers
Michael Polanyi
Comparison fields: 5 of 208
Communication1.6k
Strategy and Management3.4k
Management of Technology and Innovation1.3k
Human Factors and Ergonomics337
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management1.3k
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Polanyi
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Polanyi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Polanyi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Polanyi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Polanyi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Polanyi. The network helps show where Michael Polanyi may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Polanyi, linked wherever they
have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers
they share.
Border = papers with Michael PolanyiLine = papers co-authored togetherMichael Polanyi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more,
or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.