Michael Piper

119 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Peers

Michael Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Developmental Neuroscience 925
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Molecular Biology 2.8k
  • Cell Biology 666
  • Cancer Research 467
Replace Victor S. Tarabykin with:
Victor S. Tarabykin Germany
Federico Calegari Germany
Hidenori Tabata Japan
Seong‐Seng Tan Australia
Anita C. Hall United Kingdom
Diogo S. Castro Portugal
Pierre Billuart France
Debra L. Silver United States
José María Frade Spain
Matthew R. Sarkisian United States
Michael Piper relative to Victor S. Tarabykin Germany Victor S. Tarabykin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Victor S. Tarabykin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Piper. The network helps show where Michael Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Piper Line = papers co-authored together Michael Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 123 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010267
2 2006231
3 2005211
4 2004164
5 2008146
6 2005141
7 2010123
8 200696
9 200394
10 200992
11 200889
12 200088
13 201284
14 200883
15 201180
16 202178
17 200877
18 201773
19 201272
20 201469

About Michael Piper

Michael Piper is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Cancer Research, having authored 123 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (47 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (22 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (19 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (17 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (14 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (14 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (9 papers) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (925 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Molecular Biology (2.8k citations), Cell Biology (666 citations) and Cancer Research (467 citations). Michael Piper has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christine E. Holt, Richard M. Gronostajski, Linda J. Richards, Lachlan Harris, Christine Weinl, William A. Harris, Melissa Helen Little, Sharon L. Mason, Oressia H. Zalucki and Tracey J. Harvey. Their work appears in journals such as Development, Cerebral Cortex, Journal of Neuroscience, The Journal of Comparative Neurology and Neural Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact