Michael Philipp

26 papers receiving 267 citations

Peers

Michael Philipp
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Applied Psychology 30
  • General Decision Sciences 11
  • Sensory Systems 15
  • Social Psychology 62
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 37
Replace Bella Rozenkrants with:
Bella Rozenkrants United States
Fernando P. Ponce Chile
K. P. H. Lemmens Netherlands
Melissa Mercincavage United States
John J. McGraw Denmark
Oh‐Ryeong Ha United States
Marta Baño Spain
Robert B. Michael New Zealand
Ruben C. Arslan Germany
Jill North United States
Michael Philipp relative to Bella Rozenkrants United States Bella Rozenkrants's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Bella Rozenkrants · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Philipp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Philipp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Philipp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Philipp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Philipp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Philipp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Philipp. The network helps show where Michael Philipp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Philipp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Philipp Line = papers co-authored together Michael Philipp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201458
2 201629
3 201621
4 201721
5 201619
6 201216
7 201414
8 201914
9 201713
10 201913
11 202010
12 20228
13 20207
14 20136
15 20165
16 20204
17 20174
18 20243
19 20202
20 20022

About Michael Philipp

Michael Philipp is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sensory Systems, having authored 29 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Humor Studies and Applications (2 papers), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (2 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (30 citations), General Decision Sciences (11 citations), Sensory Systems (15 citations), Social Psychology (62 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (37 citations). Michael Philipp has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Katherine R. Storrs, Andy Towers, Katharine H. Greenaway, Laura Lombardo, Kathleen D. Vohs, Stephen Hill, Matthew J. Hornsey, Winnifred R. Louis, Peter Robert Cannon and Toby Mündel. Their work appears in journals such as Social Development, Food Quality and Preference, Frontiers in Psychology, The Journal of Social Psychology and PeerJ.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact