Eric J. Vanman

69 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Eric J. Vanman
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Social Psychology 977
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 548
  • Applied Psychology 193
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 758
  • General Decision Sciences 62
Replace Heather M. Gray with:
Heather M. Gray United States
Yuri Miyamoto United States
Jamin Halberstadt New Zealand
Brian Parkinson United Kingdom
Takahiko Masuda Canada
Marianne LaFrance United States
Sylvia A. Morelli United States
Rainer Reisenzein Germany
Kent D. Harber United States
José Miguel Fernández Dols Spain
Eric J. Vanman relative to Heather M. Gray United States Heather M. Gray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Heather M. Gray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eric J. Vanman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric J. Vanman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric J. Vanman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric J. Vanman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric J. Vanman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric J. Vanman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric J. Vanman. The network helps show where Eric J. Vanman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eric J. Vanman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eric J. Vanman Line = papers co-authored together Eric J. Vanman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000227
2 2006208
3 1997165
4 2014131
5 2018112
6 1997101
7 201598
8 201195
9 200394
10 200991
11 201488
12 201670
13 201565
14 200463
15 202360
16 200254
17 199652
18 201952
19 201252
20 201650

About Eric J. Vanman

Eric J. Vanman is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 73 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (15 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (14 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (10 papers), Infant Health and Development (7 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (7 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (6 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (6 papers) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (977 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (548 citations), Applied Psychology (193 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (758 citations) and General Decision Sciences (62 citations). Eric J. Vanman has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stephanie J. Tobin, Renée M. Tobin, Louis G. Tassinary, William G. Graziano, Lynn C. Miller, Stephen J. Read, Pramila Rani, Changchun Liu, Nilanjan Sarkar and Michael E. Dawson. Their work appears in journals such as Cognition & Emotion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact