Michael N. Pham

1.6k citations
54 papers · 893 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Michael N. Pham

52 papers receiving 864 citations

Peers

Michael N. Pham
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 378
  • Virology 72
  • Parasitology 60
  • Clinical Psychology 178
  • Marketing 78
Replace Amanda L. Duffy with:
Amanda L. Duffy Australia
Dennis A. Bagarozzi United States
Heather Clark United States
Grégory Michel France
H. Friedman United States
Jitka Lindová Czechia
Eva Jozífková Czechia
Elizabeth T. Miller United States
Elizabeth Atwood Lawrence United States
Kateřina Klapilová Czechia
Michael N. Pham relative to Amanda L. Duffy Australia Amanda L. Duffy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.3×
Amanda L. Duffy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael N. Pham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael N. Pham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael N. Pham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael N. Pham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael N. Pham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael N. Pham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael N. Pham. The network helps show where Michael N. Pham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael N. Pham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael N. Pham Line = papers co-authored together Michael N. Pham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201572
2 201670
3 201365
4 202255
5 201435
6 201935
7 201333
8 201631
9 201131
10 199430
11 201430
12 202128
13 201527
14 201325
15 201524
16 201422
17 201519
18 201518
19 202017
20 201417

About Michael N. Pham

Michael N. Pham is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Clinical Psychology and Insect Science, having authored 54 papers that have together received 893 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (34 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (11 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (10 papers), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (8 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (7 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (6 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (6 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (378 citations), Virology (72 citations), Parasitology (60 citations), Clinical Psychology (178 citations) and Marketing (78 citations). Michael N. Pham has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and China. Frequent co-authors include Todd K. Shackelford, Nicole Barbaro, David M. Buss, Virgil Zeigler‐Hill, Yael Sela, Daniel Conroy‐Beam, Bernhard Fink, Bettina Weege, Christopher J. Holden and Kui Cheng. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Evolutionary Psychology, Human Nature, iScience and Personal Relationships.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact