Michael Moffitt

21 papers receiving 561 citations

Peers

Michael Moffitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 162
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 320
  • Neurology 108
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 237
  • Pharmacology 145
Replace Filippo Agnesi with:
Filippo Agnesi United States
Jeyakumar Subbaroyan United States
Niranjan Khadka United States
Bryan Lad Howell United States
Kelsey A. Potter–Baker United States
Katja Witscher Germany
Zhiyang Song Sweden
Emily L. Foldes United States
Kristian Hennings Denmark
Zachary T. Irwin United States
Michael Moffitt relative to Filippo Agnesi United States Filippo Agnesi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Filippo Agnesi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Moffitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Moffitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Moffitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Moffitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Moffitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Moffitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Moffitt. The network helps show where Michael Moffitt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Moffitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Moffitt Line = papers co-authored together Michael Moffitt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005119
2 2017116
3 201197
4 201456
5 200444
6 202135
7 200524
8 200620
9 201912
10 201811
11 200511
12 20075
13 20064
14 20233
15 20243
16 20243
17 20043
18 20243
19 20192
20 20051

About Michael Moffitt

Michael Moffitt is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Physiology and Pharmacology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 573 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (8 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (7 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers), Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (3 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (162 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (320 citations), Neurology (108 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (237 citations) and Pharmacology (145 citations). Michael Moffitt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Cameron C. McIntyre, Warren M. Grill, Kevin J. Otto, Scott F. Lempka, Matthew D. Johnson, Daryl R. Kipke, Simon Thomson, Jianwen Wendy Gu, Sarah Love‐Jones and Nikunj K. Patel. Their work appears in journals such as Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface, Molecular Therapy, Clinical Neurophysiology, Neuroscience and Journal of Neurophysiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact