Michael Mitchell

13 papers receiving 287 citations

Peers

Michael Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Urology 32
  • Physiology 87
  • Biochemistry 25
  • Emergency Medicine 23
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 32
Replace Cevad Şekuri with:
Cevad Şekuri Türkiye
Milena A. Gebska United States
Jan Abrahamsen Denmark
Mélissa Wills United States
Linda D. Wallen United States
Abdirashit Maripov Kyrgyzstan
H. H. Edel Germany
Christian Karcher Germany
Rongrong Bian China
R. A. Herigault France
Michael Mitchell relative to Cevad Şekuri Türkiye Cevad Şekuri's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Cevad Şekuri · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Mitchell. The network helps show where Michael Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Michael Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1996116
2 200763
3
Foreign body ingestion in prisoners - the Belfast experience.
200836
4 200324
5 200521
6 201919
7 200211
8 20029
9 20015
10
Creation and implementation of a prospective pediatric clinical outcomes registry.
20114
11 20023
12 20231
13 20101
14 20201
15 20110

About Michael Mitchell

Michael Mitchell is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Urology, Genetics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (4 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (2 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (1 paper), Urologic and reproductive health conditions (1 paper), Foreign Body Medical Cases (1 paper), Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (1 paper) and Restraint-Related Deaths (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (32 citations), Physiology (87 citations), Biochemistry (25 citations), Emergency Medicine (23 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (32 citations). Michael Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include William M. Chilian, David V. DeFily, Christiane Tiefenbacher, May Bisharat, P D Carey, Byron D. Joyner, Gail E. Richards, Catherine Pihoker, Mark W. Burns and Melissa A. Parisi. Their work appears in journals such as Urology, The Journal of Urology, Circulation, Blood and Acta Neurochirurgica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact