Michael Mian

81 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Michael Mian
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 476
  • Health Informatics 33
  • Genetics 219
  • Oncology 278
  • Neurology 146
Replace Enver Vardar with:
Enver Vardar Türkiye
Roberto S Oliveri Denmark
Nemanja Damjanov Serbia
Bo Xiang China
Mads Agerbæk Denmark
Ewald Wöll Austria
Chiara Crotti Italy
B. L. Hazleman United Kingdom
Hisami Iri Japan
Sławomir Jeka Poland
Michael Mian relative to Enver Vardar Türkiye Enver Vardar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×16.5×
Enver Vardar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Mian

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Mian's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Mian with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Mian more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Mian

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Mian. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Mian. The network helps show where Michael Mian may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Mian, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Mian Line = papers co-authored together Michael Mian links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201575
2 201474
3 200867
4 201059
5 202450
6 201449
7 201942
8 200939
9 200538
10
The value of the ImmunoCyt/uCyt+ test in the detection and follow-up of carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder.
200536
11 201235
12 201330
13 201029
14 201129
15 201728
16 201528
17 201627
18 201427
19 201026
20 201623

About Michael Mian

Michael Mian is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Genetics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery, having authored 88 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (38 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (13 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (8 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (7 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (7 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers) and Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (476 citations), Health Informatics (33 citations), Genetics (219 citations), Oncology (278 citations) and Neurology (146 citations). Michael Mian has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Patrizia Mondello, Salvatore Cuzzocrea, Armin Pycha, Christine Mian, Vincenzo Pitini, Evi Comploj, Michele Lodde, Salvatore Palermo, Michael Fiegl and Francesco Bertoni. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Annals of Hematology, Internal and Emergency Medicine, European Urology and Annals of Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact