Marco Foppoli
Impact in
Papers in
- Neurology 16
- CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment 16
-
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment 15
- Co-authors
- Andrés J.M. Ferreri (20 shared papers)Giovanni Citterio (6 shared papers)Michele Reni (7 shared papers)Maurilio Ponzoni (13 shared papers)Luca Gianotti (1 shared paper)Giuseppe Consogno (1 shared paper)Laura Galli (1 shared paper)Marco Braga (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Hematological Oncology (3 papers)British Journal of Haematology (3 papers)Cancer Letters (2 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (2 papers)Blood (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- ItalySwitzerlandBelgium
In The Last Decade
Marco Foppoli
28 papers receiving 727 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Neurology 369
- Genetics 222
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 311
- Immunology 135
- Rheumatology 71
Countries citing papers authored by Marco Foppoli
This map shows the geographic impact of Marco Foppoli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marco Foppoli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marco Foppoli more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marco Foppoli
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marco Foppoli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marco Foppoli. The network helps show where Marco Foppoli may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Marco Foppoli, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 135 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 77 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 75 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 72 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 65 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 59 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 56 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 54 | |
| 9 | The hypereosinophilic syndrome: fluorescence in situ hybridization detects the del(4)(q12)-FIP1L1/PDGFRA but not genomic rearrangements of other tyrosine kinases. | 2005 | 48 |
| 10 | 2007 | 25 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 24 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 19 | Questions and answers in the management of primary central nervous system and ocular lymphomas. | 2003 | 3 |
| 20 | 2017 | 3 |
About Marco Foppoli
Marco Foppoli is a scholar working on Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, Oncology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 30 papers that have together received 748 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (16 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (15 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (5 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (4 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (2 papers), Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (2 papers) and CAR-T cell therapy research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (369 citations), Genetics (222 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (311 citations), Immunology (135 citations) and Rheumatology (71 citations). Marco Foppoli has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Switzerland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Andrés J.M. Ferreri, Giovanni Citterio, Michele Reni, Maurilio Ponzoni, Luca Gianotti, Giuseppe Consogno, Laura Galli, Marco Braga, Claudio Fortis and Oreste Gentilini. Their work appears in journals such as Hematological Oncology, British Journal of Haematology, Cancer Letters, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Blood.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.