Michael Method
Impact in
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 0.5%
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments 2
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments 1
- Co-authors
- Jennifer Scalici (2 shared papers)John F. Boggess (2 shared papers)Lynn D. Kowalski (2 shared papers)Emma Rossi (2 shared papers)Anastasia Ivanova (2 shared papers)Rabbie K. Hanna (2 shared papers)Leigh A. Cantrell (2 shared papers)Kevin Schuler (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Lancet Oncology (1 paper)Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey (1 paper)Future Oncology (1 paper)Nature Communications (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaFrance
In The Last Decade
Michael Method
3 papers receiving 810 citations
Michael Method's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 575
- Reproductive Medicine 194
- Cancer Research 115
- Immunology and Allergy 20
- Molecular Biology 177
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Method
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Method's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Method with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Method more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Method
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Method. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Method. The network helps show where Michael Method may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Michael Method, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): a multicentre, prospective, cohort study Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 632 |
| 2 | 2015 | 162 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 4 | 2025 | 0 |
About Michael Method
Michael Method is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Epidemiology and Hematology, having authored 4 papers that have together received 818 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (1 paper), Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms (1 paper), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (1 paper), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (1 paper), Cellular transport and secretion (1 paper) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (575 citations), Reproductive Medicine (194 citations), Cancer Research (115 citations), Immunology and Allergy (20 citations) and Molecular Biology (177 citations). Michael Method has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and France. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer Scalici, John F. Boggess, Lynn D. Kowalski, Emma Rossi, Anastasia Ivanova, Rabbie K. Hanna, Leigh A. Cantrell, Kevin Schuler, Carine Rossé and Vandhana Muralidharan-Chari. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet Oncology, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, Future Oncology and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.