Michael McDermott

537 citations
15 papers · 238 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Michael McDermott

11 papers receiving 232 citations

Peers

Michael McDermott
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Gender Studies 70
  • Genetics 45
  • Health Informatics 3
  • Emergency Medical Services 11
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 45
Replace Claire Karekezi with:
Claire Karekezi Rwanda
David A. Kasle United States
Rebecca Zener Canada
Brandy Vaughn United States
Kelly P. Schultz United States
Charlotte Burford United Kingdom
Silvia Hernández‐Durán Germany
Christine M. D’Aguillo United States
Andres F. Doval United States
Anna C. Lawson McLean Germany
Michael McDermott relative to Claire Karekezi Rwanda Claire Karekezi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Claire Karekezi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael McDermott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael McDermott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael McDermott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael McDermott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael McDermott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael McDermott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael McDermott. The network helps show where Michael McDermott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael McDermott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael McDermott Line = papers co-authored together Michael McDermott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201997
2 199653
3 202032
4 201715
5 202210
6 20239
7 20238
8 19795
9 20244
10 20242
11 20221
12 19981
13 19981
14 20250
15 20250

About Michael McDermott

Michael McDermott is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Gender Studies, Surgery, Genetics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 15 papers that have together received 238 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Brain Metastases and Treatment (6 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (3 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (1 paper), Lung Cancer Research Studies (1 paper), Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (1 paper) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (70 citations), Genetics (45 citations), Health Informatics (3 citations), Emergency Medical Services (11 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (45 citations). Michael McDermott has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mitchel S. Berger, Manish K. Aghi, Harsh Wadhwa, Sumedh S. Shah, Angad Beniwal, Jia‐Shu Chen, Penny K. Sneed, William M. Wara, Keith A. Weaver and Theodore L. Phillips. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of neurosurgery, Neurology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact