Scott Shapiro

3.2k citations
83 papers · 2.4k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

    • Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation 5
    • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 5
    • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 14
    • Spinal Cord Injury Research 10

Scott Shapiro

80 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Scott Shapiro
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 538
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 427
  • Neurology 285
  • Surgery 743
  • Ophthalmology 115
Replace R. N. Şener with:
R. N. Şener Türkiye
Robert M. Quencer United States
Nur Altınörs Türkiye
Herbert J. Manz United States
J. Delavelle Switzerland
Antônio José da Rocha Brazil
Hugh Garton United States
Tommaso Tartaglione Italy
Károly Balogh United States
Sanjay Behari India
Scott Shapiro relative to R. N. Şener Türkiye R. N. Şener's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
R. N. Şener · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Shapiro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Shapiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Shapiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Shapiro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Shapiro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Shapiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Shapiro. The network helps show where Scott Shapiro may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Shapiro, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Shapiro Line = papers co-authored together Scott Shapiro links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005147
2 1992144
3 1993138
4 2000130
5 2003101
6 200489
7 199584
8 200180
9 200377
10 200273
11 199468
12 199067
13 198861
14 199757
15 199352
16 200150
17 200250
18 199647
19 200643
20 201243

About Scott Shapiro

Scott Shapiro is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Epidemiology, having authored 83 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (14 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (10 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (6 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (5 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (5 papers) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (538 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (427 citations), Neurology (285 citations), Surgery (743 citations) and Ophthalmology (115 citations). Scott Shapiro has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Thomas J. Scully, John Mealey, Richard B. Rodgers, Matthew D. Scharff, Arturo Casadevall, Richard B. Borgens, Robert L. Campbell, Joel C. Boaz, David O. Beenhouwer and Marta Feldmesser. Their work appears in journals such as Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery Spine, Journal of neurosurgery, Journal of Neurotrauma and Spine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact