Scott Shapiro

3.2k citations
83 papers · 2.6k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

    • Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation 5
    • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 5
    • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 14
    • Spinal Cord Injury Research 10

Scott Shapiro

80 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Scott Shapiro
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 593
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 463
  • Neurology 324
  • Surgery 817
  • Ophthalmology 122
Replace Robert M. Quencer with:
Robert M. Quencer United States
R. N. Şener Türkiye
Nur Altınörs Türkiye
J. Delavelle Switzerland
Herbert J. Manz United States
Antônio José da Rocha Brazil
Masayuki Maeda Japan
Sanjay Behari India
Hugh Garton United States
Shelley N. Chou United States
Scott Shapiro relative to Robert M. Quencer United States Robert M. Quencer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Robert M. Quencer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Shapiro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Shapiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Shapiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Shapiro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Shapiro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Shapiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Shapiro. The network helps show where Scott Shapiro may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Shapiro, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Shapiro Line = papers co-authored together Scott Shapiro links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005162
2 1992154
3 1993151
4 2000140
5 2003107
6 200495
7 199589
8 200186
9 200380
10 200278
11 199475
12 199075
13 198868
14 199757
15 199355
16 200153
17 199652
18 200251
19 199746
20 201245

About Scott Shapiro

Scott Shapiro is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Epidemiology, having authored 83 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (14 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (10 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (6 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (5 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (5 papers) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (593 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (463 citations), Neurology (324 citations), Surgery (817 citations) and Ophthalmology (122 citations). Scott Shapiro has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Thomas J. Scully, John Mealey, Richard B. Rodgers, Richard B. Borgens, Arturo Casadevall, Matthew D. Scharff, Robert L. Campbell, Martin B. Kleiman, Joel C. Boaz and David O. Beenhouwer. Their work appears in journals such as Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery Spine, Journal of neurosurgery, Infection and Immunity and Journal of Neurotrauma.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact