Michael Lebowitz

2.6k citations
63 papers · 2k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Lebowitz

61 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Michael Lebowitz
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Artificial Intelligence 909
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 221
  • General Psychology 25
  • Immunology 193
  • Information Systems 208
Replace Joseph Michael Scandura with:
Joseph Michael Scandura United States
Jeff Shrager United States
Partha Dasgupta United States
Joel Martin United States
Florian Prinz Germany
Thomas Schlange Germany
Nathan Goodman United States
Ranit Aharonov United States
David B. Edelman United States
James H. Jones United States
Michael Lebowitz relative to Joseph Michael Scandura United States Joseph Michael Scandura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.7×
Joseph Michael Scandura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Lebowitz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Lebowitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Lebowitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Lebowitz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Lebowitz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Lebowitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Lebowitz. The network helps show where Michael Lebowitz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Lebowitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Lebowitz Line = papers co-authored together Michael Lebowitz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987243
2 1983150
3
Generalization and memory in an integrated understanding system
1980139
4 1985124
5 1999111
6 1986109
7 199893
8 198476
9 198474
10 198863
11 198356
12 198053
13 199143
14 199943
15 199341
16 201740
17 198339
18 199739
19 199638
20 202237

About Michael Lebowitz

Michael Lebowitz is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Information Systems, Immunology and Neurology, having authored 63 papers that have together received 2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural Language Processing Techniques (21 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (10 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (7 papers), Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (5 papers), Machine Learning and Algorithms (5 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (4 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (4 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (909 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (221 citations), General Psychology (25 citations), Immunology (193 citations) and Information Systems (208 citations). Michael Lebowitz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and China. Frequent co-authors include Peter L. Pedersen, Jonathan P. Schneck, Roger C. Schank, Sean M. O’Herrin, Joan Glick Bieler, Lawrence A. Birnbaum, Didier Marguet, Elias T. Spiliotis, Michael A. Edidin and Drew M. Pardoll. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Cognitive Science, Poetics, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Cancers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact