Michael L. Good

767 citations
30 papers · 551 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Michael L. Good

30 papers receiving 494 citations

Peers

Michael L. Good
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Family Practice 33
  • Physiology 237
  • Emergency Medical Services 59
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 44
  • Research and Theory 5
Replace Deven Chandra with:
Deven Chandra Canada
Tobias Everett Canada
V. Chopra Netherlands
David Hananel United States
Stephanie N. Sudikoff United States
Chloe Macaulay United Kingdom
Julie Woodhouse United States
Sharon Griswold‐Theodorson United States
Christine Park United States
J. S. DENSON United States
Michael L. Good relative to Deven Chandra Canada Deven Chandra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Deven Chandra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael L. Good

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael L. Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael L. Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael L. Good more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael L. Good

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael L. Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael L. Good. The network helps show where Michael L. Good may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael L. Good, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael L. Good Line = papers co-authored together Michael L. Good links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003189
2 198964
3 199746
4 201729
5 199826
6 199823
7 199222
8 200221
9 199721
10 202015
11 199712
12 199710
13 19979
14 20019
15 20188
16 19917
17 20216
18 19926
19 19906
20 20234

About Michael L. Good

Michael L. Good is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions, having authored 30 papers that have together received 551 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (3 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (2 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (33 citations), Physiology (237 citations), Emergency Medical Services (59 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (44 citations) and Research and Theory (5 citations). Michael L. Good has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include J. S. Gravenstein, Willem L. van Meurs, Samsun Lampotang, T. Y. Euliano, J. S. Gravenstein, John J. Andrews, Rod Westhorpe, Donald Caton, Michael A. Mastro and Paul Kubilis. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, Anesthesia & Analgesia and Journal of Healthcare Leadership.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact