Michael Kyle

430 citations
29 papers · 228 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Kyle

25 papers receiving 210 citations

Peers

Michael Kyle
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Political Science and International Relations 159
  • Health 42
  • Gender Studies 39
  • Sociology and Political Science 147
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 17
Replace Daniel S. Lawrence with:
Daniel S. Lawrence United States
Vaughn J. Crichlow United States
Julie Barkworth Australia
Alan Beckley Australia
Matthew Radburn United Kingdom
Branko Lobnikar Slovenia
Trevor Jones United Kingdom
Christine Famega United States
Bernard Rostker United States
James Hoggett United Kingdom
Michael Kyle relative to Daniel S. Lawrence United States Daniel S. Lawrence's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Daniel S. Lawrence · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Kyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Kyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Kyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Kyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Kyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Kyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Kyle. The network helps show where Michael Kyle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Michael Kyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Kyle Line = papers co-authored together Michael Kyle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201648
2 201626
3 202126
4 201924
5 201221
6 202016
7 201214
8 20219
9 20227
10 20216
11 20126
12 20134
13 20143
14 20132
15 20122
16 20192
17 20162
18 20211
19 20131
20 20161

About Michael Kyle

Michael Kyle is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, History and Philosophy of Science and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 228 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (7 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (5 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (4 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers), Indian Economic and Social Development (2 papers) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (159 citations), Health (42 citations), Gender Studies (39 citations), Sociology and Political Science (147 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (17 citations). Michael Kyle has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Schafer, D. R. White, Matthew J. Giblin, George W. Burruss, Julie Hibdon, Mary K. Stohr, Brett Garland and Sara Moore. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Crime and Justice, Policing An International Journal, Asian Affairs, International Journal of Police Science & Management and Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact