Sara Moore

31 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Sara Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • General Decision Sciences 171
  • Applied Psychology 121
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 475
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 153
  • Sensory Systems 43
Replace James A. Grange with:
James A. Grange United Kingdom
Shane W. Bench United States
Mandy Hütter Germany
Jason Geller United States
Kaileigh A. Byrne United States
Li‐Lin Rao China
Constantinos Hadjichristidis Italy
Peter Lewinski Netherlands
Dennis Rünger United States
Marvin A. Hecht United States
Sara Moore relative to James A. Grange United Kingdom James A. Grange's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
James A. Grange · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Moore. The network helps show where Sara Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sara Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara Moore Line = papers co-authored together Sara Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011231
2 2009216
3 2012114
4 200785
5 200972
6 200766
7 201243
8 200432
9 201525
10 200724
11 200322
12 200820
13 200718
14 201915
15
WHY WE NEED AN R 2 MEASURE OF FIT (AND NOT ONLY ONE) IN PROC LOGISTIC AND PROC GENMOD
199814
16 201711
17 201711
18 201810
19 20157
20 20137

About Sara Moore

Sara Moore is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Decision Sciences, Clinical Psychology and Surgery, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (3 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (2 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers) and Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (171 citations), Applied Psychology (121 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (475 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (153 citations) and Sensory Systems (43 citations). Sara Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gregory S. Berns, C. Mónica Capra, Charles Noussair, Jeremy Ginges, Scott Atran, Emily Bell, Michael J. Prietula, Jonathan Chappelow, Jan B. Engelmann and Kaja Z. LeWinn. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, PLoS ONE, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience and Criminal Justice Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact