Michael J. Wan

1.1k citations
51 papers · 690 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Michael J. Wan

48 papers receiving 659 citations

Peers

Michael J. Wan
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Emergency Medicine 105
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 197
  • Ophthalmology 93
  • Neurology 115
  • Information Systems and Management 50
Replace Jonathan J. Rasouli with:
Jonathan J. Rasouli United States
Arminas Ragauskas Lithuania
Deborah M. Green United States
Majid Haghjoo Iran
Christopher L. Kramer United States
Sanchit Ahuja United States
Michael R. Silver United States
Quinlan D. Buchlak Australia
Gabriel Laurent France
Mark M. Zaki United States
Michael J. Wan relative to Jonathan J. Rasouli United States Jonathan J. Rasouli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.7×
Jonathan J. Rasouli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Wan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Wan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Wan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Wan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Wan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Wan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Wan. The network helps show where Michael J. Wan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael J. Wan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael J. Wan Line = papers co-authored together Michael J. Wan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008119
2 201069
3 201751
4 201650
5 200844
6 201439
7 201835
8 201433
9 201827
10 201424
11 202319
12 201815
13 202311
14 202410
15 201910
16 201410
17 20149
18 20199
19 20208
20 20218

About Michael J. Wan

Michael J. Wan is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Ophthalmology, Surgery and Genetics, having authored 51 papers that have together received 690 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (14 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (6 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (4 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (3 papers), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (2 papers) and Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (105 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (197 citations), Ophthalmology (93 citations), Neurology (115 citations) and Information Systems and Management (50 citations). Michael J. Wan has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David G. Hunter, Ankoor S. Shah, Lillian Sung, Wendy J. Ungar, Murray Krahn, L. Santiago Medina, Andréa S. Doria, Gena Heidary, Hiroshi Nomura and Charles H. Tator. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of Neuro-Oncology and Clinical ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact