Michael J. Im

2.4k citations
78 papers · 1.9k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

    • Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques 26
    • Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques 5
    • Wound Healing and Treatments 20

Michael J. Im

76 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Michael J. Im
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Rehabilitation 276
  • Developmental Neuroscience 94
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 307
  • Surgery 703
  • Dermatology 124
Replace Neil H Riordan with:
Neil H Riordan United States
Sufan Chien United States
Clara Crescioli Italy
Lee A. Borthwick United Kingdom
George Agrogiannis Greece
Michael Schäffer Germany
David G. Monroe United States
Michael J. Im relative to Neil H Riordan United States Neil H Riordan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Neil H Riordan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Im

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Im's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Im with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Im more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Im

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Im. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Im. The network helps show where Michael J. Im may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael J. Im, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael J. Im Line = papers co-authored together Michael J. Im links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983209
2 1985137
3 1985111
4 1970107
5 198499
6 200093
7 199078
8 198669
9
Improved survival in free skin flap transfers in rats.
198664
10 200152
11 197148
12 198247
13 199845
14 199142
15 199036
16 198431
17 198930
18 196627
19 199225
20 199224

About Michael J. Im

Michael J. Im is a scholar working on Surgery, Rehabilitation, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology and Physiology, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (26 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (20 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (10 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (5 papers), Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (5 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (5 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (4 papers) and Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (276 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (94 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (307 citations), Surgery (703 citations) and Dermatology (124 citations). Michael J. Im has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include John E. Hoopes, Gregory B. Bulkley, Paul N. Manson, Robert M. Anthenelli, Robert M. Graham, G. Melville Williams, Kenji Adachi, Michael Angel, Christina Wang and Ronald S. Swerdloff. Their work appears in journals such as Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Journal of Surgical Research, Annals of Plastic Surgery, Journal of Investigative Dermatology and Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact