Robert Spence

4.0k citations
131 papers · 3.0k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Spence

124 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Robert Spence
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
  • Rehabilitation 508
  • Human-Computer Interaction 237
  • Dermatology 252
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 467
  • Epidemiology 640
Replace Stefan Langer with:
Stefan Langer Germany
Moi Hoon Yap United Kingdom
Matthew Cooper United States
Adel Al-Jumaily Australia
Umile Giuseppe Longo Italy
Kayvan Najarian United States
Giulio Rosati Italy
Michael J. Daly Canada
Vincenzo Ferrari Italy
Luigi Gallo Italy
Robert Spence relative to Stefan Langer Germany Stefan Langer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.9×
Stefan Langer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Spence

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Spence's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Spence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Spence more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Spence

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Spence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Spence. The network helps show where Robert Spence may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Spence, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Spence Line = papers co-authored together Robert Spence links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 131 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982177
2 2004141
3 1992126
4
Modalities for the assessment of burn wound depth.
2006126
5 2000125
6 1998119
7 1992104
8 199893
9 200293
10 199091
11 199687
12 200684
13 200071
14 201167
15 199861
16 199757
17 198955
18 199049
19 200147
20 197847

About Robert Spence

Robert Spence is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Surgery, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Epidemiology and Rehabilitation, having authored 131 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Visualization and Analytics (17 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (14 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (12 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (12 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (8 papers), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (8 papers), VLSI and FPGA Design Techniques (7 papers) and Video Analysis and Summarization (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (508 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (237 citations), Dermatology (252 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (467 citations) and Epidemiology (640 citations). Robert Spence has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Andrew M. Munster, Mark Apperley, James A. Fauerbach, Robert P. Roca, Oscar de Bruijn, Leslie J. Heinberg, Lisa Tweedie, John Lawrence, R.S. Soin and Fredrick M. Wigley. Their work appears in journals such as Electronics Letters, Annals of Plastic Surgery, Information Visualization, Burns and Computer-Aided Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact