Michael Haynes

35 papers receiving 377 citations

Peers

Michael Haynes
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Public Administration 15
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 59
  • Metals and Alloys 9
  • Neurology 46
  • Pharmacology 52
Replace Alison Hughes with:
Alison Hughes United Kingdom
John N. Robinson United States
Todd Watson United States
Robin J.M. Gray United Kingdom
Daniel H. Williams United States
Malka Guillot France
Leif Johansson Sweden
Laura A. Foster United States
Ingrid Thyberg Sweden
Dan S. Cohen United States
Michael Haynes relative to Alison Hughes United Kingdom Alison Hughes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.1×
Alison Hughes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Haynes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Haynes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Haynes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Haynes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Haynes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Haynes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Haynes. The network helps show where Michael Haynes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Michael Haynes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Haynes Line = papers co-authored together Michael Haynes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200141
2 201240
3 200232
4 199232
5 200231
6 200230
7 200027
8 199723
9 200020
10 199818
11 200418
12 200516
13 201716
14
A Century of State Murder?: Death and Policy in Twentieth Century Russia
200316
15
History and Revolution: Refuting Revisionism
200714
16 200212
17 20228
18 20008
19 19927
20 20037

About Michael Haynes

Michael Haynes is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Surgery and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 41 papers that have together received 454 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Russia and Soviet political economy (4 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (4 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (4 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (3 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (3 papers), Metallurgy and Material Forming (2 papers), Metal Forming Simulation Techniques (2 papers) and Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (15 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (59 citations), Metals and Alloys (9 citations), Neurology (46 citations) and Pharmacology (52 citations). Michael Haynes has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard P. Gangloff, Stephen J. Edmondston, John K. McGeachie, Esther Kingston‐Mann, Frank Mastaglia, Lesley Cala, Robin Hart, Graeme J. Hankey, Alexandra Bremner and David Ost. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, Journal of Economic Issues, Europe Asia Studies, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A and Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact