Daniel H. Williams

2.0k citations
74 papers · 935 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

    • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 9
    • Genital Health and Disease 6
    • Byzantine Studies and History 10

Daniel H. Williams

62 papers receiving 852 citations

Peers

Daniel H. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Reproductive Medicine 119
  • Classics 52
  • Surgery 406
  • Religious studies 46
  • Urology 48
Replace P. J. M. van Kesteren with:
P. J. M. van Kesteren Netherlands
Anna Torrång Sweden
David Nunns United Kingdom
Martha F. Goetsch United States
Nienke M. Nota Netherlands
Arlene B. Baratz United States
B. Cuzin France
Christel J.M. de Blok Netherlands
Katherine M. Gast United States
Juza Chen Israel
Daniel H. Williams relative to P. J. M. van Kesteren Netherlands P. J. M. van Kesteren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
P. J. M. van Kesteren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel H. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel H. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel H. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel H. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel H. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel H. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel H. Williams. The network helps show where Daniel H. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel H. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel H. Williams Line = papers co-authored together Daniel H. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011153
2 2008117
3 201078
4 201172
5 200551
6 200737
7 199924
8 199522
9 200522
10 200421
11
Evaluation of the anxiolytic properties of tetrahydropalmatine, a Corydalis yanhusuo compound, in the male Sprague-Dawley rat.
201119
12 201818
13 201918
14 201917
15 201316
16 199115
17 199615
18
Ambrose of Milan and the end of the Nicene-Arian conflicts
199514
19 200514
20 199614

About Daniel H. Williams

Daniel H. Williams is a scholar working on Surgery, Classics, Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies and Rheumatology, having authored 74 papers that have together received 935 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Byzantine Studies and History (10 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (9 papers), Genital Health and Disease (6 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (6 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (6 papers), Theology and Canon Law Studies (6 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (5 papers) and Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (119 citations), Classics (52 citations), Surgery (406 citations), Religious studies (46 citations) and Urology (48 citations). Daniel H. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Donald S. Garbuz, Bassam A. Masri, Nelson V. Greidanus, Clivе P. Duncan, Larry I. Lipshultz, Edward Karpman, Philippe E. Spiess, Louis L. Pisters, Daniel W. Gauthier and Max Maizels. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, Urology, Journal of early Christian studies, The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery and Harvard Theological Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact