Europe Asia Studies

2.7k papers and 24.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.7k papers published in Europe Asia Studies in the last decades have received a total of 24.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Europe Asia Studies usually cover Political Science and International Relations (1.8k papers), Sociology and Political Science (1.2k papers) and Economics and Econometrics (203 papers) specifically the topics of Russia and Soviet political economy (398 papers), Soviet and Russian History (374 papers) and Eastern European Communism and Reforms (374 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Europe Asia Studies are Владимир Гельман, Taras Kuzio, Stephen White, Grigorii V. Golosov, Thomas Ambrosio, Anne White, Volodymyr Kulyk, Richard Sakwa, Andrei Yakovlev and Gwendolyn Sasse.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Europe Asia Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Europe Asia Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Europe Asia Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Europe Asia Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Europe Asia Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Europe Asia Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Europe Asia Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025