Michael H. Thomas

36 papers receiving 623 citations

Peers

Michael H. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Horticulture 23
  • Analytical Chemistry 135
  • Animal Science and Zoology 89
  • Pharmacology 135
  • Food Science 152
Replace Paolo Stacchini with:
Paolo Stacchini Italy
Mitchell Kelly United Kingdom
Saša Janković Serbia
Jin-Hwan Hong South Korea
F. W. Oehme United States
Rita Hannisdal Norway
Joseph G. Ebel United States
Sukla Lakshman United States
Jon F. Ericson United States
Agnieszka Tomza–Marciniak Poland
Michael H. Thomas relative to Paolo Stacchini Italy Paolo Stacchini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.8×
Paolo Stacchini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael H. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael H. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael H. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael H. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael H. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael H. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael H. Thomas. The network helps show where Michael H. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael H. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael H. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Michael H. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201685
2 200684
3 200268
4 197650
5 197747
6 199143
7 200028
8 201625
9 197824
10 200623
11 197422
12 200620
13 201618
14 200215
15 201613
16 201912
17 200911
18 198111
19 200910
20
Evaluating the Effect of Proximity to Hog Farms on Residential Property Values: A GIS-Based Hedonic Price Model Approach
200510

About Michael H. Thomas

Michael H. Thomas is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals, Spectroscopy, Analytical Chemistry and Pharmacology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 688 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (6 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (5 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (5 papers), Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (5 papers), Sports Performance and Training (3 papers), Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases (3 papers) and Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (23 citations), Analytical Chemistry (135 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (89 citations), Pharmacology (135 citations) and Food Science (152 citations). Michael H. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Japan. Frequent co-authors include David N. Heller, Daniel Solís, R.W. Frei, Sergio Álvarez, Cristina B. Nochetto, Steve P. Burns, Robert A. Garrett, Eric Rohrig, Nathan G. Rummel and Winda Noor Santi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, The Journal of Urology, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, International journal of exercise science and American Journal of Veterinary Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact