Michael Grosser

779 citations
15 papers · 349 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Grosser

15 papers receiving 303 citations

Peers

Michael Grosser
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Mathematical Physics 322
  • Theoretical Computer Science 39
  • History and Philosophy of Science 57
  • Algebra and Number Theory 57
  • Applied Mathematics 115
Replace Roger Plymen with:
Roger Plymen United Kingdom
Tanguy Rivoal France
Florin P. Boca United States
Bert van Geemen Italy
Paul Loya United States
L. J. Bunce United Kingdom
Jürgen Leiterer Germany
S. M. Bates United States
Heinz Huber Switzerland
Jun-Muk Hwang South Korea
Michael Grosser relative to Roger Plymen United Kingdom Roger Plymen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.3×
Roger Plymen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Grosser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Grosser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Grosser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Grosser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Grosser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Grosser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Grosser. The network helps show where Michael Grosser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Michael Grosser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Grosser Line = papers co-authored together Michael Grosser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2001195
2 200236
3 200131
4 198424
5 197918
6 197914
7 19846
8 19846
9 20115
10 19794
11 20183
12 19973
13 19872
14
Diffeomorphism invariant construction of nonlinear generalised functions
20001
15 20221

About Michael Grosser

Michael Grosser is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Algebra and Number Theory, History and Philosophy of Science, Theoretical Computer Science and Geometry and Topology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (7 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (7 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (5 papers), Advanced Operator Algebra Research (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (2 papers), Physics and Engineering Research Articles (1 paper) and Probability and Statistical Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (322 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (39 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (57 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (57 citations) and Applied Mathematics (115 citations). Michael Grosser has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Michael Kunzinger, Roland Steinbauer, Michael Oberguggenberger, Viktor Losert, James Vickers, Éva Farkas, Helmuth K. Urbantke and Günther Hörmann. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, manuscripta mathematica, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society and Studia Mathematica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact