Michael Glanzberg

1.3k citations
25 papers · 421 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Glanzberg

23 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers

Michael Glanzberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 303
  • Philosophy 243
  • History and Philosophy of Science 84
  • Language and Linguistics 94
  • Artificial Intelligence 133
Replace Delia Graff with:
Delia Graff United States
Dilip Ninan United States
Ofra Magidor United Kingdom
Joseph Almog
Alex Oliver United Kingdom
Brian Rabern United Kingdom
Daniel Rothschild United Kingdom
Josh Dever United States
Mark Crimmins United States
John Oliver Perry
Michael Glanzberg relative to Delia Graff United States Delia Graff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Delia Graff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Glanzberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Glanzberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Glanzberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Glanzberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Glanzberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Glanzberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Glanzberg. The network helps show where Michael Glanzberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Michael Glanzberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Glanzberg Line = papers co-authored together Michael Glanzberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007121
2 200447
3 200145
4 200431
5 200723
6 200617
7 200216
8 200214
9 201013
10
Binding, compositionality, and semantic values
202011
11 200710
12 20029
13
Meaning, Concepts, and the Lexicon
20119
14
Not All Contextual Parameters Are Alike
20099
15 20019
16
Definite Descriptions and Quantifier Scope: Some Mates Cases Reconsidered
20078
17 20058
18 20088
19
Formal Theories of Truth
20185
20 20034

About Michael Glanzberg

Michael Glanzberg is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics, Philosophy and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (11 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (2 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Logic (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (303 citations), Philosophy (243 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (84 citations), Language and Linguistics (94 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (133 citations). Michael Glanzberg has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Susanna Siegel, Jeffrey C. King, Jc Beall, Anil K. Gupta and David Ripley. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Philosophical Studies, The Philosophical Review, Noûs and Croatian Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact