Michael G. Wohl

627 citations
18 papers · 255 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Michael G. Wohl

16 papers receiving 204 citations

Peers

Michael G. Wohl
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 61
  • Clinical Biochemistry 21
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 28
  • Physiology 39
  • Neurology 22
Replace Robert S. Goodhart with:
Robert S. Goodhart United States
Bo Edgren Sweden
Jean M. Patterson Canada
Norman Jolliffe United States
U. Nayak United States
D Grafnetter Czechia
Jessie H. Ridout Canada
A. H. Samiy United States
A. A. Henly United Kingdom
Florence Olson United States
Michael G. Wohl relative to Robert S. Goodhart United States Robert S. Goodhart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Robert S. Goodhart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael G. Wohl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael G. Wohl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael G. Wohl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael G. Wohl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael G. Wohl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael G. Wohl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael G. Wohl. The network helps show where Michael G. Wohl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Michael G. Wohl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael G. Wohl Line = papers co-authored together Michael G. Wohl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 196966
2 196042
3 195641
4 196020
5 196918
6 195715
7 19538
8 19707
9 19516
10 19596
11 19596
12 19565
13 19534
14 19514
15 19543
16 19512
17 19541
18 19531

About Michael G. Wohl

Michael G. Wohl is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Neurology, Physiology, Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 255 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (3 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (2 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (2 papers), Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients (1 paper), Diabetes and associated disorders (1 paper) and Biochemical Acid Research Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (61 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (21 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (28 citations), Physiology (39 citations) and Neurology (22 citations). Michael G. Wohl has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert S. Goodhart, Howard Levy, Charles R. Shuman, Richard Turner and Jerome I. Brody. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, Experimental Biology and Medicine, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Medical Clinics of North America and Circulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact