Medical Clinics of North America

6.4k papers and 123.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.4k papers published in Medical Clinics of North America in the last decades have received a total of 123.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Medical Clinics of North America usually cover Surgery (1.3k papers), Epidemiology (979 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (857 papers) specifically the topics of Diet and metabolism studies (162 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (154 papers) and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (120 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Medical Clinics of North America are Ralph A. DeFronzo, Burke A. Cunha, James R. Sowers, Ernest H. Runyon, Edward D. Fröhlich, Jonathan M. Samet, Mitchell S. Cappell, Alireza Atri, Hallgrim Kløve and Carol Teutsch.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Medical Clinics of North America

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Medical Clinics of North America. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Medical Clinics of North America.

Countries where authors publish in Medical Clinics of North America

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Medical Clinics of North America. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Medical Clinics of North America with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medical Clinics of North America more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025