Michael E. Staub

693 citations
22 papers · 175 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • History top 5%
    • American Political and Social Dynamics
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes

Papers in

Michael E. Staub

21 papers receiving 117 citations

Peers

Michael E. Staub
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • General Psychology 13
  • History 39
  • Gender Studies 24
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 11
  • Literature and Literary Theory 22
Replace John C. Spurlock with:
John C. Spurlock United States
Peter Cryle Australia
Hugo Vezzetti Argentina
Michael Ermarth United States
Dalia Judovitz United States
Hilge Landweer Germany
David Harley Serlin United States
Dušan I. Bjelić United States
Barbara G. Walker United States
Michel Plon France
Michael E. Staub relative to John C. Spurlock United States John C. Spurlock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
John C. Spurlock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Staub

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Staub's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Staub with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Staub more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Staub

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Staub. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Staub. The network helps show where Michael E. Staub may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201140
2
Love my rifle more than you : young and female in the U.S. Army
200533
3 199414
4 199514
5 201812
6 199711
7
The Jewish 1960s : an American sourcebook
20048
8 20167
9 20045
10
The Mismeasure of Minds: Debating Race and Intelligence between Brown and The Bell Curve
20185
11 19975
12 20164
13 20203
14 19993
15 20232
16 19912
17 20222
18 20151
19 20201
20 20201

About Michael E. Staub

Michael E. Staub is a scholar working on History, General Psychology, Music, History and Philosophy of Science and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 175 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Race, History, and American Society (4 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (3 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (3 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (2 papers), Music History and Culture (2 papers), Jewish Identity and Society (2 papers), Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (2 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (13 citations), History (39 citations), Gender Studies (24 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (11 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (22 citations). Michael E. Staub has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Their work appears in journals such as Representations, American Quarterly, Environmental History, MELUS Multi-Ethnic Literature of the United States and Environmental Humanities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact