Michael Ermarth
Impact in
-
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- History top 5%
- Philosophy, History, and Historiography
Papers in
-
- European history and politics 1
-
- Race, History, and American Society 1
- Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy 1
- Co-authors
- Karl F. Morrison (1 shared paper)Donald R. Kelley (1 shared paper)Thomas J. Saunders (1 shared paper)Rudolf A. Makkreel (1 shared paper)Hayden White (1 shared paper)Kurt H. Wolff (1 shared paper)Theodore S. Hamerow (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (8 papers)The Journal of Modern History (2 papers)History and Theory (1 paper)The Monist (1 paper)The Business History Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michael Ermarth
13 papers receiving 84 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- General Psychology 6
- History 32
- Philosophy 34
- Classics 9
- History and Philosophy of Science 10
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Ermarth
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Ermarth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Ermarth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Ermarth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Ermarth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Ermarth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Ermarth. The network helps show where Michael Ermarth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Michael Ermarth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1981 | 49 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 26 | |
| 3 | 1982 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 13 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 13 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 10 | |
| 7 | 1981 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1980 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1975 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1985 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1975 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 15 | Kurt Wolff : a portrait in essays & letters | 1991 | 0 |
| 16 | 2002 | 0 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 0 |
About Michael Ermarth
Michael Ermarth is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Philosophy and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 17 papers that have together received 153 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Science, and History (1 paper), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (1 paper), Violence, Religion, and Philosophy (1 paper), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (1 paper), European history and politics (1 paper), Race, History, and American Society (1 paper), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (1 paper) and Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (6 citations), History (32 citations), Philosophy (34 citations), Classics (9 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (10 citations). Michael Ermarth has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karl F. Morrison, Donald R. Kelley, Thomas J. Saunders, Rudolf A. Makkreel, Hayden White, Kurt H. Wolff and Theodore S. Hamerow. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Modern History, History and Theory, The Monist and The Business History Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.