Michael Ermarth
Impact in
- Philosophy top 5%
- Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Papers in
-
- European history and politics 3
-
- Race, History, and American Society 2
- Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy 1
- Co-authors
- Donald R. Kelley (1 shared paper)Karl F. Morrison (1 shared paper)Thomas J. Saunders (1 shared paper)Rudolf A. Makkreel (1 shared paper)Hayden White (1 shared paper)Kurt H. Wolff (1 shared paper)Theodore S. Hamerow (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (9 papers)The Journal of Modern History (3 papers)History and Theory (2 papers)The Business History Review (1 paper)German Studies Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michael Ermarth
15 papers receiving 124 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- General Psychology 9
- Philosophy 55
- History and Philosophy of Science 22
- History 47
- Classics 9
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Ermarth
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Ermarth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Ermarth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Ermarth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Ermarth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Ermarth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Ermarth. The network helps show where Michael Ermarth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Michael Ermarth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1981 | 62 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 38 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 29 | |
| 4 | 1982 | 24 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 20 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 11 | |
| 7 | 1981 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1980 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1975 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1975 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1981 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1985 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 15 | Kurt Wolff : a portrait in essays & letters | 1991 | 1 |
| 16 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1974 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1981 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1989 | 0 |
About Michael Ermarth
Michael Ermarth is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, History and Philosophy of Science and Philosophy, having authored 22 papers that have together received 227 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European history and politics (3 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers), European Political History Analysis (1 paper), Media, Religion, Digital Communication (1 paper), American History and Culture (1 paper), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper) and Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (9 citations), Philosophy (55 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (22 citations), History (47 citations) and Classics (9 citations). Michael Ermarth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Donald R. Kelley, Karl F. Morrison, Thomas J. Saunders, Rudolf A. Makkreel, Hayden White, Kurt H. Wolff and Theodore S. Hamerow. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Modern History, History and Theory, The Business History Review and German Studies Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.