John C. Spurlock

478 citations
15 papers · 172 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • History top 5%
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes

Papers in

    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes 3
    • Medical History and Research 2
    • History of Emotions Research 2
    • Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices 4

John C. Spurlock

14 papers receiving 141 citations

Peers

John C. Spurlock
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • General Psychology 15
  • History 50
  • Clinical Psychology 70
  • Philosophy 29
  • Literature and Literary Theory 20
Replace Paul Lerner with:
Paul Lerner United States
Ivan Crozier United Kingdom
Andreas Killen United States
Marijke Gijswijt‐Hofstra Netherlands
Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen United States
Janet Malcolm
J. B. Pontalis
Greg Eghigian United States
Daniel Burston United States
Sidney M. Bolkosky United States
John C. Spurlock relative to Paul Lerner United States Paul Lerner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Paul Lerner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John C. Spurlock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Spurlock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Spurlock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Spurlock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Spurlock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Spurlock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Spurlock. The network helps show where John C. Spurlock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside John C. Spurlock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John C. Spurlock Line = papers co-authored together John C. Spurlock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 200337
2 199830
3 200425
4 200117
5 199010
6 20029
7 19969
8 19908
9 19945
10 20025
11 19985
12 19964
13 20154
14 19903
15 19891

About John C. Spurlock

John C. Spurlock is a scholar working on History, Clinical Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and General Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 172 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (4 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (3 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (3 papers), American History and Culture (2 papers), Medical History and Research (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), History of Emotions Research (2 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (15 citations), History (50 citations), Clinical Psychology (70 citations), Philosophy (29 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (20 citations). John C. Spurlock has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Sylvia D. Hoffert. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Early Republic, Journal of American History, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, History of Psychology and Journal of Social History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact