Michael E. Rush

476 citations
25 papers · 398 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Michael E. Rush

25 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

Michael E. Rush
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Reproductive Medicine 155
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 58
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 106
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 22
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 68
Replace J. L. Vandalem with:
J. L. Vandalem Belgium
Yoshihito Inoue Japan
Naoko Tsukamoto Japan
J. W. Clemens United States
H.G. Dahlén Germany
JOHN DEFAZIO United States
Bernadette Rossano France
Şeref Erdoğan Türkiye
Cecilia Martin United States
Jocelyne Guy Canada
Michael E. Rush relative to J. L. Vandalem Belgium J. L. Vandalem's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
J. L. Vandalem · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Rush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Rush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Rush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Rush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Rush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Rush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Rush. The network helps show where Michael E. Rush may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Rush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Rush Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Rush links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198677
2 198842
3 198342
4 198236
5 198130
6 198724
7 197923
8 198517
9 198012
10 197911
11 198710
12 19809
13 19878
14 19898
15 19818
16 19787
17 19867
18 19856
19 19875
20 19825

About Michael E. Rush

Michael E. Rush is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 25 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (10 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (7 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (7 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (4 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (3 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers) and TGF-β signaling in diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (155 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (58 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (106 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (22 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (68 citations). Michael E. Rush has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Harry Lipner, Hartmut H. Malluche, Marie–Claude Faugere, Robert M. Friedler, C. A. Blake, Oladapo A. Ashiru, Charles A. Blake, Michael Babich, R.E. Papka and Harold H. Traurig. Their work appears in journals such as Endocrinology, Endocrine Research, Biology of Reproduction, Life Sciences and Experimental Biology and Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact