Michael E. Mitchell

604 citations
28 papers · 403 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Michael E. Mitchell

26 papers receiving 359 citations

Peers

Michael E. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Urology 155
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 44
  • Surgery 103
  • Global and Planetary Change 52
  • Aquatic Science 16
Replace Matthew Clements with:
Matthew Clements United States
Jason J. Miller United States
E. Rhys Davies United Kingdom
Sanjeet Kumar Singh India
Pieter H. Vos Netherlands
Maria Luisa Lobo Portugal
W.G. Armstrong United Kingdom
Michael P. White United States
Steve Li United States
Rahul Srivastava India
Michael E. Mitchell relative to Matthew Clements United States Matthew Clements's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×22×
Matthew Clements · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Mitchell. The network helps show where Michael E. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199655
2 199954
3 199844
4 201141
5 200338
6 202232
7 200025
8 199317
9 202216
10 200014
11 200412
12 196410
13 20069
14 19626
15 20235
16 20223
17 20213
18 20153
19 19993
20 19873

About Michael E. Mitchell

Michael E. Mitchell is a scholar working on Urology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Computer Networks and Communications and Oceanography, having authored 28 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Terahertz technology and applications (6 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (5 papers), Error Correcting Code Techniques (4 papers), Marine and fisheries research (3 papers), Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques (3 papers), Coronary Artery Anomalies (2 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (2 papers) and Wireless Communication Security Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (155 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (44 citations), Surgery (103 citations), Global and Planetary Change (52 citations) and Aquatic Science (16 citations). Michael E. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Richard W. Grady, Michael C. Carr, Gregg R. Poulakis, David A. Blewett, James S. Tweddell, Michael E. Barnes, Darius Bägli, Mark Horowitz, Jonathan F. Holzman and L. Rudolph. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, Optical Materials Express, Gulf of Mexico Science, Urologic Clinics of North America and World Journal of Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact