Michael Drake

69 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Michael Drake
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
  • Toxicology 90
  • History 159
  • Economics and Econometrics 297
  • Inorganic Chemistry 116
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 98
Replace Thomas Wilson with:
Thomas Wilson United States
John Wiseman Australia
Brian Harrison Canada
Thomas Jones Japan
Michael Hughes United States
 Sir
Martin J. Murray United States
William Stafford South Africa
John C. Green United States
Paul Sharp Denmark
Michael Drake relative to Thomas Wilson United States Thomas Wilson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Thomas Wilson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Drake

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Drake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Drake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Drake more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Drake

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Drake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Drake. The network helps show where Michael Drake may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Drake, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Drake Line = papers co-authored together Michael Drake links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1965169
2 1986116
3 200099
4 198078
5 201770
6 196965
7 200561
8 200359
9 200355
10 197050
11 202045
12 198337
13 196335
14 198333
15 200532
16
Quality control measures for cervical cytology laboratories.
198831
17 202029
18 201629
19 196628
20 202124

About Michael Drake

Michael Drake is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Ecology, Organic Chemistry, Epidemiology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 74 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (18 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (9 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (8 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (5 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (4 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (4 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (4 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (90 citations), History (159 citations), Economics and Econometrics (297 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (116 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (98 citations). Michael Drake has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Botswana and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Stephan Thernstrom, Michael R. Detty, Gabriele Medley, Heather Mitchell, Frank V. Bright, Lynn Hollen Lees, T. H. Hollingsworth, Joel Hartter, Jonathan Salerno and Charles Francavilla. Their work appears in journals such as Population Studies, The Economic History Review, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, The American Historical Review and Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact