Michael DiMattina

705 citations
13 papers · 291 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Michael DiMattina

12 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers

Michael DiMattina
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Reproductive Medicine 144
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 136
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 47
  • Immunology 60
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 40
Replace Mélanie Hamel with:
Mélanie Hamel Canada
Nathália Nogueira da Costa Brazil
Birgitta Josefsson Sweden
S. Pasqualini Argentina
Rebecca L. Kelley Australia
Sanae Orisaka Japan
Prisca P. Feuerstein France
Maud Caillaud France
Marcos Henrique Barreta Brazil
Ilaria Natali Italy
Michael DiMattina relative to Mélanie Hamel Canada Mélanie Hamel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mélanie Hamel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael DiMattina

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael DiMattina's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael DiMattina with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael DiMattina more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael DiMattina

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael DiMattina. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael DiMattina. The network helps show where Michael DiMattina may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Michael DiMattina, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael DiMattina Line = papers co-authored together Michael DiMattina links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 198680
2 199549
3 201639
4 201334
5 199229
6 198822
7 198721
8
Follicular and estradiol parameters that improve success with natural cycle in vitro fertilization.
201410
9 20103
10 19941
11 20101
12 20171
13 20171

About Michael DiMattina

Michael DiMattina is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Genetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (8 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (6 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (5 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (2 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (1 paper), Hormonal and reproductive studies (1 paper) and Sperm and Testicular Function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (144 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (136 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (47 citations), Immunology (60 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (40 citations). Michael DiMattina has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Barry D. Albertson, D. Lynn Loriaux, David E. Seyler, John Gordon, M. Payson, John H. Zhang, Kangpu Xu, Jun Liu, Winifred Mak and Laxmi A. Kondapalli. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Human Reproduction, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Contraception and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact