Michael D. Good

40 papers receiving 653 citations

Peers

Michael D. Good
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Human-Computer Interaction 290
  • Speech and Hearing 97
  • Information Systems and Management 100
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 224
  • Signal Processing 123
Replace Candace Kamm with:
Candace Kamm United States
Tony Stockman United Kingdom
Nitin Sawhney United States
Martin J. Halvey United Kingdom
Zoya Bylinskii United States
Graham Dove United States
Lou Boves Netherlands
Mariët Theune Netherlands
Vera Demberg Germany
Ina Wechsung Germany
Michael D. Good relative to Candace Kamm United States Candace Kamm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Candace Kamm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael D. Good

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael D. Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael D. Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael D. Good more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael D. Good

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael D. Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael D. Good. The network helps show where Michael D. Good may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Michael D. Good, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael D. Good Line = papers co-authored together Michael D. Good links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984148
2 1996135
3 198678
4 198633
5 199531
6 200429
7 201327
8 199526
9 198225
10 198522
11
Extensible marckup language (XML) for music applications: an introduction
200121
12 198119
13 198117
14 199216
15 198915
16 198814
17 198513
18 200012
19 200212
20 198311

About Michael D. Good

Michael D. Good is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Information Systems and Management, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing and Social Psychology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 775 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Usability and User Interface Design (12 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (5 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (5 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (5 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Music and Audio Processing (4 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (4 papers) and Air Traffic Management and Optimization (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (290 citations), Speech and Hearing (97 citations), Information Systems and Management (100 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (224 citations) and Signal Processing (123 citations). Michael D. Good has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Robert H. Gilkey, John Whiteside, Dennis R. Wixon, Sandra J. Jones, Patrick George, Norm Archer, Michael C. Dorneich, Mark A. Ericson, John Stewart and Patricia May Ververs. Their work appears in journals such as ACM SIGPLAN Notices, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Communications of the ACM, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society and SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact