Michael D. Fine

2k citations
52 papers · 1.3k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Michael D. Fine

47 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Michael D. Fine
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Pharmacy 238
  • General Health Professions 448
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 309
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 27
  • Safety Research 115
Replace Amanda Smith Barusch with:
Amanda Smith Barusch United States
Mary K. Zimmerman United States
Teppo Kröger Finland
Mary Breheny New Zealand
Hazel Qureshi United Kingdom
Cristian Balducci Italy
Dulcie Groves United Kingdom
Kirstein Rummery United Kingdom
Sheila M. Neysmith Canada
Elizabeth Lightfoot United States
Michael D. Fine relative to Amanda Smith Barusch United States Amanda Smith Barusch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Amanda Smith Barusch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael D. Fine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael D. Fine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael D. Fine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael D. Fine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael D. Fine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael D. Fine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael D. Fine. The network helps show where Michael D. Fine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Michael D. Fine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael D. Fine Line = papers co-authored together Michael D. Fine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005382
2 2005310
3 201284
4 200557
5 200944
6 201844
7
A Caring society? Care and the dilemmas of human service in the twenty-first century
200740
8 201138
9 202037
10 201734
11 200731
12 201219
13 200718
14 200717
15 199216
16 201715
17 200014
18 200414
19 200512
20 201410

About Michael D. Fine

Michael D. Fine is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Education, Sociology and Political Science, General Social Sciences and Safety Research, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (22 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (20 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (12 papers), Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality (12 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (5 papers), Social Sciences and Policies (5 papers), Nursing care and research (3 papers) and Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (238 citations), General Health Professions (448 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (309 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (27 citations) and Safety Research (115 citations). Michael D. Fine has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Caroline Glendinning, Cathy Thomson, Claire L Thompson, Henry Brodaty, Kirstein Rummery, Joan C. Tronto, Anna Yeatman, Gary W. Dowsett, Peter Saunders and Mary Larkin. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal on Ageing, Australian Journal of Social Issues, Ageing and Society, Health Sociology Review and Home Health Care Services Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact