Health Sociology Review

685 papers and 9.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 685 papers published in Health Sociology Review in the last decades have received a total of 9.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Health Sociology Review usually cover General Health Professions (264 papers), Sociology and Political Science (199 papers) and Clinical Psychology (118 papers) specifically the topics of Patient and Public Engagement in Healthcare Research (55 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (48 papers) and Obesity and Health Practices (45 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Health Sociology Review are John Germov, Evan Willis, Deborah Lupton, John Coveney, John L. Oliffe, Nick J. Fox, Jeffrey Fuller, David McDonald, Esther D. Rothblum and Rhonda J. Factor.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Health Sociology Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Health Sociology Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Health Sociology Review.

Countries where authors publish in Health Sociology Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Health Sociology Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Health Sociology Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health Sociology Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025